Looking for:
Los 19 Mejores programas para crear y editar vídeos en PC y Mac.How to Import and Edit H in Sony Vegas Pro Smoothly |
AVCHD - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre.Best video formats: choosing what's best for you
After the sad demise of Stage6. You can click the first link to view the file in a Javascript popup window. If you left-click on "Direct Link" the file will either prompt for download or open a browser plugin, depending how your browser is set up. Direct Link. Direct Link may open automatically in Quicktime. Direct Link may open automatically in Windows Media Player.
Using exactly half the height can make de-interlacing work cleanly. After conversion, you can effortlessly use the converted H. Plus, it supports encoding camera shootings in different formats H. Run the best H. The program supports batch conversion and joining multiple video clips into one file.
Once the conversion completes, you can click "Open" button to get the output files effortlessly. On the more user-visible features side, there are now new plugins and transitions added to the existing collection.
Users can now use visual effects like the ones found on After Effects or FCP: glint, rays, defocusing etc. But Sony had this surprise under its sleeve for me. Also, Vegas comes with a powerful SDK that allows third parties to develop their own plugins.
Finally, the 64bit version of Vegas Pro 9 has seen a refresh with some fixes, but the fundamental problems it had with version 8. I personally run Vista 64bit on my beefed up video editing station, but I prefer to still use the 32bit of Vegas.
There is no proxy editing support, and one has to resort to scripts or complicated workflows to go around. Hopefully in the near future. Overall though, both Vegas Pro and Platinum 9 remain the best solutions for people with a strict budget but who require immense power and flexibility during editing. Personally, I always suggest Vegas to people who ask me which editor to buy.
Sure, Vegas has its problems, but most other PC editors in its price range have an order of magnitude bigger problems than Vegas, so the choice quickly becomes clear especially if you are using standard camcorders and not digirecorders. The cheaper RED Scarlet models are expected sometime this or next year.
Still, way cheaper than its actual competition. I believe that Vegas can re-apply all filters in 32bit when you export, even if you did your editing in 8bit. So, for speed, you can edit in 8 bit, and just before you render out, you change its project properties to 32bit. Then, you export, and Vegas will re-apply all filters in 32bit resulting in less quality loss. However, you can choose to export in an 8bit format e.
You are thinking in terms of a single frame and all the processing that has been gone into it. What I am telling you here is that video is not as real time as a still image, and so when you export, you can tell the editor to re-do the processing from the very beginning.
So it will treat it as 32bit from the get go, without upsampling provided your source footage is 10bit, of course. Although I could be wrong, this is what I get from it. I am no movie director by any stretch of the imagination, just doing editing of AVCHD video files of my family on Platinum 8. Is there much of an overall gain moving to 64 bit with Vegas? In overall usability terms and speed of operation? My thinking is the move to Windows 7 in a few months time might be 64 bit and a good time to upgrade to Platinum 9 64 bit?
I explained it in the article. Plus, there is no 64bit version of the Platinum version, only 32bit. And, the speed bump is extremely small. In fact, on my Vista 64, it was a bit faster exporting with 32bit rather than the 64bit version of Vegas. So I still run Vegas 32bit. Finally, yes, it takes a long time to export in HD.
Many thanks for the overview. I've done that before, it gets forwarded to legal, they get back to you with the response. Keeping in mind that we're talking mainly about licences that originate from MPEGLA who are pooling patents and I can see why they read as very restrictive. There's around eight stakeholders and their legal people who have to agree to the wording of the licence so the most restrictive prevails. Another way to look the thing is based on something that was said to me years ago.
Say I, Bob, came up with an entirely new and brilliant way to encode video and got a patent for it. The question then is how to make money from my brilliant idea.
For every 1, content creators there's 1,, content viewers. It makes commercial sense to let the content creators use my invention cheaply if not for free because that creates a demand for licences from the businesses that sell content viewers by the millions. Pretty obvious which approach is most likely to make me a millionaire : Bob.
Pretty obvious which approach is most likely to make me a millionaire : Answer "C": sue everyone you can. This whole mess starts already with the camera.
Methinks the OP doth protest too much. There is a cloaked agenda here. At least literally speaking. Reality is that they do not care about the little guys as it is not worth their time and money.
That's the big conditional statement. That's the important part. If you're making a packaged media with the camera you need a license for commercial use. I think OP just simply seeks clarity. As you can see form the legal notice in the Z5U manual you would actually violate the law selling DVDs with video recorded from that camera. I discussed this with my lawer friend and even he thinks this is a big mess.
Is this codec is exempt from the license? He needs to save the raw material for sale.
No comments:
Post a Comment